Christopher Steele, the author of the ‘dirty dossier’ on Donald Trump, was interviewed by Justice Department inspector general officials for 16 hours – and found to be credible as part of their probe into whether the FBI and DOJ abused surveillance powers.
The interview with Steele, a former top spy on Russia for Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service, or MI6, took place while Trump was in London in June for a formal state visit with Queen Elizabeth and a meeting with UK Prime Minister Theresa May.
It was part of an inquiry being conducted by the DOJ inspector general into the use of FISA surveillance powers by the FBI and DOJ before the 2016 election, which targeted Trump campaign worker Carter Page.
The inspector general is investigating whether the ‘golden showers’ dossier drawn up by Steele may have been improperly used by officials to gain surveillance warrants targeting the two, and possibly others.
Separately, Attorney General William Barr started a probe into how Mueller’s investigation began – a move that thrilled President Trump who has long claimed he was the victim of a ‘witch hunt.’ Steele is not known to have been interviewed in that probe.
Christopher Steele was found to be credible during a 16-hour interview by Justice Department officials investigating the origins of Mueller’s Russia probe
Steele was interviewed in June when President Trump met with the Queen during a state visit
Three attorneys from the Inspector General’s office of the U.S. Department of Justice met in person in early June with Steele in Britain, said two sources with direct knowledge of the lawyers’ travels.
The interview – held over more than one day – lasted 16 hours, sources told Politico.
Steele’s dossier, made public in 2017, alleged that Moscow attempted to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and that there was potential collusion between Russia and Trump’s campaign, along with other unverified and salacious claims about the president, including that he was vulnerable to blackmail from the Russians.
The Justice Department’s inspector general has been examining the earliest stages of an FBI investigation of Trump, his former 2016 presidential campaign rival Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, Russia and former Trump adviser Carter Page.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz, whose office is an internal Justice Department watchdog, launched his probe in March 2018 amid allegations by Republican lawmakers that the FBI erred in seeking a warrant to monitor Page.
Target: Carter Page, a Trump campaign adviser, was the subject of a surveillance warrant. The DOJ inspector general is investigating whether there was abuse of the FISA surveillance powers to gain the warrant
Trump has described the Steele dossier as ‘bogus’ and Republicans have long sought to discredit the FBI’s investigation, which was later taken over by Mueller. His final report on Russia and the Trump campaign was released in redacted form in mid-April.
In that same month, Barr told a congressional committee that the Horowitz probe would be completed by May or June.
One of the two sources said Horowitz’s investigators appear to have found Steele’s information sufficiently credible to have to extend the investigation. Its completion date is now unclear.
Horowitz’s team has been gauging Steele’s credibility as a source for the FBI.
The interview was contentious at first, sources told Politico, but ultimately, the DoJ lawyers found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising.
A key focus of the Horowitz probe is whether the FBI followed proper procedures when it applied for a warrant with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to secretly conduct surveillance on Page and his ties to Russia.
Declassified documents show that the FBI cited information in Steele’s dossier when it asked the secretive FISA court in late 2016 for a warrant to eavesdrop electronically on Page, a U.S. businessman with interests in Russia.
Additionally, during the 2016 election, Steele was hired by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS to research Trump’s Russia ties. His work was paid for in part by a law firm that represented the Democratic National Committee and Clinton.
Those ties have been seized upon by Trump allies, who charge a vast conspiracy in the making.
Attorney General William Barr ordered the investigation into the origins of the Russia probe
If Steele is found to be credible by the president’s own Justice Department that could throw cold water on the argument by Trump allies that Steele’s dossier was insufficient to prompt the FBI’s actions.
Steele has long said his dossier was not used to start the FBI’s counter-intelligence investigation into Trump’s campaign in the 2016 election.
Horowitz’s office in Washington declined to comment.
A spokesman for Orbis Business Intelligence, Steele’s London investigations firm, declined to comment.
UK government agencies declined to disclose whether they were in contact with Horowitz’s team in London.
Moscow repeatedly rejected accusations of interfering in the election.
Mueller’s report, released on April 18, said that Russia did meddle in the election in an attempt to boost Trump’s candidacy. It said Trump campaign officials had multiple contacts with Russian officials. But it found insufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and Moscow.
The report also described numerous attempts by Trump to impede Mueller’s inquiry, but it stopped short of declaring that he committed a crime. Mueller during his inquiry brought charges against 34 people, including Russian agents and ex-Trump aides.
The Justice Department is investigating how special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe began
Page, a foreign policy adviser during Trump’s campaign, drew scrutiny from the FBI, which said in legal filings in 2016 that it believed he had been ‘collaborating and conspiring’ with the Kremlin. But he was not charged.
Investigators working for Mueller in September 2017 twice interviewed Steele, who also gave written testimony to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee in August 2018. That panel and other committees of Congress have taken up where Mueller left off after his investigation ended.
Ahead of Trump’s state visit, a U.K. official said the country would be ‘helpful’ during the DoJ probe.
‘If we get that request obviously we’ll consider it. The U.S. is an ally and we would want to be helpful,’ the official said.