A salon owner who racked up £17,000 in fines by staying open during last year’s second national lockdown has indicated she plans to reopen next week.
Sinead Quinn, owner of Quinn Blakey Hairdressing, Oakenshaw, near Bradford, has suggested the salon will reopen for on January 30 on a day dubbed ‘The Great Reopening’.
Ms Quinn hit headlines in November after she repeatedly cited the Magna Carta when police officers insisted she close her business during the second national lockdown.
Sinead Quinn, owner of Quinn Blakey hairdressing salon, Oakenshaw, near Bradford, who has repeatedly defied government lockdown restriction, says she is planning to reopen next week
Magistrates were forced to order the closure of Quinn Blakey (pictured) in December despite attempts by Sinead Quinn to use the Magna Carta and Common Law to reject restrictions
The salon wracked up £17,000 worth of fixed penalty fines and magistrates ordered its closure for the final two days of the lockdown ‘to prevent nuisance to members of the public and to safeguard public health’.
Earlier this month, Kirklees Council confirmed none of the fixed penalties had been paid and it had started a prosecution process.
One Instagram comment from the salon said: ‘We’re all opening regardless of lockdown. They can’t control us all when we stand up to them.’
In a separate post shared two days ago, the comment stated: ‘When is lockdown meant to end? Feb?
‘In February you can bet your life savings that Covid-21 will be here and so will your lockdown.
‘I’d like you to sit back and watch it all play out but we’re running out of time.
Notice on the salon door in November which cites Magna Carta, a royal charter granted in 1215 by King John, and states: ‘As the business owners, we are exercising our rights to earn a living’
‘Stand up for your freedoms. 30th January. Get up and open your businesses, go out and support those businesses.
‘WE ARE THE POWER, NOT THEM.’
Ms Quinn has previously shared videos of herself telling officials that she did not ‘consent’ to being fined and cited ‘common law’.
She had posted a sign on the salon door which cited Magna Carta in defence of her decision to keep trading.
But legal experts have debunked the defence as ‘pure nonsense’ and ‘pseudo-legal rubbish’.
A Kirklees Council spokesperson said: ‘With the time given to pay the fines now passed, we have started a prosecution process and are putting our case together.
‘The process can take some time and could lead to a trial. Punishment could be an unlimited fine, decided by the court.
‘In the meantime, if further breaches occur, the same appropriate action will follow as would be the case for any business.’
What is the Magna Carta and why are businesses wrong to quote ‘clause 61’?
The Magna Carta is a royal charter agreed to by King John of England in 1215 amid a row with rebellious barons.
It promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on payments to the Crown.
But it did not last, leading to the First Barons’ War.
The Magna Carta is a royal charter agreed to by King John of England in 1215 amid a row with rebellious barons
It was reissued several times in the following years, until in 1297, it was made part of England’s statue law.
But as Parliament’s power grew, it lost much of its significance. Now, only four of its clauses still remain in use.
Ahead of the new lockdown, some businesses have put signs outside their business sighting clause 61 and saying: ‘Any attempt to enforce unlawful acts, statutes or legislative laws on myself will be taken as an act of high treason, for which, you will stand trial before a jury of the people and which still carries the gallows.’
However the clause is not one of those still in use.
One legal expert, Rupert Beloff, tweeted that while clause 61 appeared in the 1215 version, it was removed by the time it was reissued in 1216 and did not exist by the time the Magna Carta was made statute in 1297.